Senior Financial Times journalist appears to call out the BBC for ‘pro-Boris Johnson bias’

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.

A senior journalist for the Financial Times (FT) has questioned the BBC over their reporting on Boris Johnson’s first outing at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on the BBC News at Ten.

Writing on Twitter, Henry Mance, the Chief Feature Writer for the FT, wrote that “nearly everyone who watched PMQs live thought Boris Johnson was disastrous“.

However, Mance then went on to claim that if you were “watching the BBC’s 10 o’clock news, you would think he’d won it.

The Financial Times is widely regarded as a pillar of the British establishment, and for a senior FT journalist to openly question the supposedly impartial BBC over their political coverage is almost certainly unprecedented.

The astonishment was summed up neatly in the comments, with one Twitter user stating that:

“A Financial Time leader journalist calling out the BBC for their Tory bias, the world is falling off its axis.”

Whilst Tom Kibasi, Director of the IPPR Thinktank, said:

“It really says something when a senior FT journalist points out that BBC News is misleading the public with its pro-Johnson bias.”

Following his initial tweet, Mance later stated that the BBC’s coverage of PMQs may not have been a case of intentional bias, but simply because of the massively shortened format making it appear as if Johnson had been better than he actually was:

Boris Johnson faced an absolute barrage of criticism for his performance during yesterday’s PMQs, with the vast majority concluding that Jeremy Corbyn had been the clear and obvious victor.

Corbyn asked the PM six questions – as is customary – to which he received absolutely no direct answers and what have been described as ‘childish jibes’ in return.

You can watch how the BBC summarised yesterday’s PMQs battle between Johnson and Corbyn in their 10 o’clock programme below:

Evolve needs your help more than ever.

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Subscriber-Only Comments