-- Advertisement --

BBC slammed after framing Labour’s Free Broadband plans as “Communism”

-- Advertisement --

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.
Loading

The BBC have been severely criticised on social media after questioning whether the Labour Party’s plans to provide free super-fast internet to every British citizen was a sign of “Broadband ‘Communism‘”.

In an interview about Labour’s plans with the party’s Shadow Business Secretary, Rebecca Long-Bailey, the BBC’s Politics Live show displayed a graphic at the bottom of the screen which posed the question:

“Broadband ‘Communism’?”

The BBC also decided to further publicise the question by posting it to their Twitter:

The BBC’s choice to use “Communist” framing was immediately highlighted by the Senior Editor of Novara Media, Aaron Bastani, who asked:

“Does the BBC also think that a network of roads free at the point of use is also ‘communism’?”

In response to Bastani’s criticism, Politics Live Editor Rob Burley responded, claiming that:

“Here Aaron goes again pretending he doesn’t understand what quote marks are. We quoted Neil McRae who called Labour plans “broadband communism” in the interview with RLB. She rejected it. Stop pretending these are the views of the BBC when you know they are not.”

BT’s Managing Director, Neil McRae – who has just 925 followers – made the accusation on Twitter, simply stating:

“labour plans broadband communism!

However, many were not convinced with Burley’s response, with one Twitter user responding by stating:

“This is how the BBC have decided to frame it. That sets the tone for the discussion. Neutral framing would be “Labour’s broadband proposal” but this framing implies that it’s probably a bad idea by using a scare-word. They * chose * to quote McRae.”

Whilst another Twitter user, Mark Blacklock, asked:

“The only person who really thinks it’s ‘broadband communism’ is McRae himself – and even then I doubt he really does. Your parroting it in this way is disproportionate. BY your logic we should expect to see the @maitlis interview with Prince Andrew sold as “Andrew paedophile?”

In response to Blacklock’s tweet, Burley hit back saying:

“We didn’t parrot it we put it to RLB alongside a great deal else in a long interview. The fact that someone in BT thinks this makes it worth while asking. And she had time to push back.”

Another Twitter user was equally scathing of the BBC’s choice to frame Labour’s plans as Communism, stating:

“Rob, presumably you went to university and have a degree. Maybe you have more than one. You’ve worked in media for many years. How is that you apparently don’t understand something basic from media studies, the concept of FRAMING, and I do? No higher education, no media work.”

Burley again hit back, claiming:

“The framing here is from a screengrab. That’s a distortion. It came in a 10 minute interview.”

However, Burley’s response was immediately attacked:

“The framing here is in the wording of the question (”broadband communism”) and the on-screen text (‘broadband communism?’). That’s obvious and blunt framing. There is no neutrality there, no objectivity. Those were two specific decisions made, to use those descriptions.”

One Twitter user also asked whether the BBC would ever choose to describe the Conservative Party’s immigration policies as “fascism“:

And the criticism of the BBC’s bizarre decision just kept coming:

https://twitter.com/CorbynistaTeen/status/1195334744491331584?s=20

https://twitter.com/benrob1988/status/1195327079941836800?s=20

Unsurprisingly, Rebecca Long-Bailey completely rejected the claim that Labour’s plans were in any way Communist during the interview.

-- Advertisement --

Evolve needs your help more than ever!

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Tom D. Rogers

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Jess Miller

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Subscriber-Only Comments