-- Advertisement --

Labour demand apology after CBI admits it lied about cost of Labour Renationalisation plans

-- Advertisement --

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.

The Labour Party have demanded an apology from the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) after it was forced to admit that it used fabricated false information in calculating the cost of Labour’s plans to renationalise the UK’s utilities and railways.

On Monday, a report from the CBI – which claimed that it would cost £196bn for Labour to take the rail network, water, energy, and the Royal Mail back into public democratic ownership – was widely reported by much of the UK media.

However, in an email exchange between Labour and the CBI, the business lobby admitted that its calculations were not actually based on the party’s official policies.

In the emails, the CBI admitted that it had simply “assumed” that Labour would forcibly purchase the current rolling stock of around 14,000 trains, which are currently owned by private sector leasing companies:

“We have assumed the rolling stock would be bought into public ownership as the trains are currently owned by the private sector and therefore full-scale nationalisation of rail would require this. However, we recognise that this isn’t official Labour policy on nationalising the rail industry.”

It is estimated that the purchase of the rolling stock would have added around £10bn to the CBI’s total figure.

Furthermore, the CBI also refused to release exact details regarding how they arrived at their final £196bn figure, stating:

“Unfortunately we are unable to provide a breakdown of the £196bn figure as our members do not feel comfortable doing this.”

Responding to the CBI’s admission, Labour’s Shadow Transport Secretary, Andy McDonald, said the buisness lobby had based their figures on “fabricated false information” and slammed the CBI for not having “the guts to publish their figures“, before demanding an apology:

“The CBI’s shoddy research and shabby conduct does a great disservice to our political debate during the hugely challenging times through which we now live. At the very least, I would expect an apology from Carolyn Fairbairn over the distorted misrepresentations her organisation has sought to peddle.”

However, in response, the CBI said they continued to stand behind their analysis of Labour’s plans for large-scale renationalisation.

The CBI’s initial analysis was widely – and largely uncriticially -reported by the UK mainstream media, including the BBC.

However, despite the emergence of the CBI’s calculation error, as well as their refusal to release details on how they arrived at their final figure, the majority of the mainstream media are yet to set the record straight or issue any corrections.

-- Advertisement --

Evolve needs your help more than ever!

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Tom D. Rogers

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Jess Miller

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Subscriber-Only Comments