-- Advertisement --

The Times claims Corbyn voted against Falklands War despite Corbyn not being an MP at the time

-- Advertisement --

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.

The billionaire-owned Murdoch newspaper, The Times, has been forced to make an urgent correction after falsely accusing Jeremy Corbyn of voting against the Falklands war – a claim made despite the Labour leader not actually becoming an MP until more than an entire year after the issue was voted on in Parliament.

In an article which once again attempted to criticise the Labour leader’s stance on National Security, war and nuclear weapons, the online version of the Murdoch newspaper directly claimed that as an MP, Jeremy Corbyn voted against military intervention in the Falklands.

However, the authors of the article, Rachel Sylvester and Alice Thomson, appear to have done absolutely no research whatsoever into the completely baseless claim beforehand.

In fact, the Falklands War began in April 1982 and ended just two months later in June of the same year, whilst Jeremy Corbyn was only first elected to his Islington North constituency almost a full year after the war had finished, in June 1983.

Despite the gravity of their error, today’s Times Corrections and Clarifications page contained a typically understated correction, simply acknowledging that:

“We wrongly stated in early editions (News, Nov 6) that as an MP Jeremy Corbyn voted against military intervention in the Falklands. Mr Corbyn was first elected to parliament the year after the Falklands War.”

The correction has also been added to the bottom of the original article.

However, as with the vast majority of tiny and entirely un-promoted corrections made by mainstream media outlets, it is extremely unlikely that anyone who read the original version will ever actually see the correction and know the truth.

The Times is regulated by the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) – who, as their name suggests, claim to be independent, but whose board actually contains numerous senior employees of the very media outlets they are supposed to be regulating.

IPSO have become an extremely controversial organisation in recent years, with many complaints about seemingly serious breaches of their code going completely unpunished.

In 2016, IPSO cleared The S*n after they published a deeply repulsive article by racist rent-a-gob Katie Hopkins which was widely compared to Nazi propaganda and contained a line which directly compared immigrants to cockroaches.

The supposedly independent press authority again cleared The S*n after an article by Trevor Kavanagh – who just so happened to be on the board of IPSO at the time – again replicated Nazi propaganda in a deeply racist rant about what he called “The Muslim Problem“.

However, IPSO did force The Times to make a front page correction after it made numerous false claims in an article about a “white Christian child” who was supposedly left distraught after being fostered by a Muslim couple.

However, The Times have never apologised for publishing the above lies, and it is extremely unlikely they will be forced to give any form of apology for publishing an outright lie about the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn either.

-- Advertisement --

Evolve needs your help more than ever!

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Tom D. Rogers

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Jess Miller

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Subscriber-Only Comments