-- Advertisement --

ATOS nurse continues PIP assessment as epileptic claimant bleeds from mouth after multiple seizures

-- Advertisement --

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.

When claimant Daniel Marshall arrived for his Personal Independence Payment assessment he was already stressed and anxious. This isn’t unusual.

Disability assessments are at best stressful stressful, and, more often than not, extremely traumatic experiences for many disabled people.

Thanks to decades of despicably anti-working class ‘scrounger’ rhetoric within the media and political establishment, many disabled claimants have been made to feel like they have to ‘prove’ they’re not lying about their conditions.

So when Mr Marshall turned up for his assessment, he probably wasn’t expecting to suffer a series of severe ‘grand mal’ epileptic fits within minutes of beginning.

Most shockingly, however, is that when he did suffer a series of severe epileptic fits during his disability assessment, Marshall’s wife claims the assessor simply continued asking questions whilst her husband lay fitting on the floor.

The seizures were so severe that it is claimed they ’caused violent convulsions and led the father-of-two to bite his tongue and begin to bleed from his mouth.’

According to Mr Marshall’s wife Sinitta, once the convulsions had subsided, the assessor stepped outside the room, called her boss for advice, and then asked if she could continue the assessment. At the same time the assessor is also alleged to have reminded Sinitta that her husband would receive no PIP if he was unable to complete the assessment.

As Sinitta described it;

We feel like she may as well have prodded his twitching body with her foot while still taking notes.

During his first set of seizures, Mr Marshall is said to have lost control of his bladder and wet himself – a common symptom in grand mal seizures. After the second series had finished, the assessor is alleged to have continued asking questions. A third series of fits after the assessment saw Mr Marshall taken to hospital.

Incredibly, despite having witnessed these seizures, the government-employed assessor, according to Mr Marshall, didn’t think to include them in the report she sent to the DWP.

The DWP disputes the Marshall’s account, stating;

Following a review of this case we do not recognize the account that has been provided and no complaint has been received.

Tory Welfare Policy; Admired by a few, hated by the many.

ATOS, one of the private companies contracted by the Department of Work and Pensions, has a shocking reputation for both the quality and accuracy of its assessments.

Its work has been roundly slammed by advocacy groups, disability organisations, as well as the Parliamentary Work and Pensions Committee.

Stories of assessors with no specialist qualifications assessing claimants with multiple, and severely complex interlinked conditions are rife. Furthermore, accusations of assessors simply inventing manifestly inaccurate assessment statements are equally numerous.

Seemingly cruel decisions based on these assessments are also commonplace. Complaints about PIP assessments, including those alleging flagrant dishonesty from ‘health professionals’ conducting assessments have shot up in recent years.

Unfortunately for claimants, their claims are usually decided by the DWP based solely on these assessments. If, as so many have claimed, assessments are often inaccurate, dishonest or otherwise unacceptable, it’s almost always the most vulnerable claimants who suffer the most.

This comes after recent confirmation of the DWP’s 80% quota for refusing Mandatory Reconsiderations (MR). Until recently, the DWP had an 80% target for refusing to change the original decisions reviewed in MRs. However, this deeply flawed target was scrapped after huge pressure from disability campaigners and the Work and Pensions Select Committee who argued that such a target couldn’t possibly be compatible with producing fair and accurate assessments.  

ATOS; Not the only problem.

This despicable level of dishonesty and injustice isn’t simply confined to ATOS. Maximus and Capita have also come under similar fire.

According to the Committee for Work and Pensions, neither ATOS or Capita has, at any point during their PIP contract, met the maximum 3% target for assessments deemed unacceptable. Indeed, Capita’s own internal audit found almost 60% of its assessments were ‘unacceptable.’

Not forgetting, naturally, the UN report describing the UK’s current treatment of the disabled as a ’human catastrophe’ involving ‘grave and systematic violations’ of disabled people’s human rights.

This being the same UN report sneeringly dismissed by disgraced former Cabinet Minister Damian Green – then DWP Secretary – as ‘patronising and offensive’ while claiming current Tory policy supposedly made Britain a ‘world leader in disability rights and equality.’

A few who haven’t been unfortunate enough in life to experience the humiliation of disability assessments may well agree with the likes of Green and his cohorts.

The many, however – especially those suffering under the significant weight of seemingly endless Tory austerity – will almost certainly beg to differ.

Become An Evolve Politics Subscriber

Your subscriptions go directly into paying our writers a standard fee for every article they produce. So if you want to help us stay truly independent, please think about subscribing. We literally couldn’t function without the support of our fantastic readers.


Or a One-Off Donation to Evolve Politics

If you don’t want to subscribe, but still want to contribute to our project, you can make a one-off donation via the donate button below. All your donations go directly to our writers for their work in exposing injustice, inequality and unfairness.

-- Advertisement --

Evolve needs your help more than ever!

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Tom D. Rogers

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Jess Miller

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Subscriber-Only Comments