-- Advertisement --

Pro-border control Daily Mail slams EU for introducing stricter, er, border controls

-- Advertisement --

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.
Loading

Yesterday’s Daily Mail front page was dominated by an article criticising the ‘shambles’ of recent long delays for British holidaymakers at European airports. 

Unsurprisingly, the tabloid blamed this on the EU, citing extra security checks as the reason for the delays.

This article has generated considerable confusion however. And it’s hardly surprising given that the Daily Mail has been criticising the EU for insufficient border controls for years.

Whenever a major terror attack takes place in Europe the Mail invariably finds a way to blame it on immigration, usually including a point about lacklustre security checks on migrants entering EU countries.

Yet the stricter regulations were introduced precisely to combat terrorism. Apparently it’s not worth trying to prevent terror attacks if this holds up Brits at the likes of Malaga and Amsterdam airports.

The Mail tries to imply that there is some sort of EU conspiracy going on here, with British travellers being targeted, by pointing out that the new rules apply in cases where passengers from outside the Schengen zone, which includes Brits, are travelling into it.

Yet within the Schengen Zone, there is no border control whatsoever. Would the Daily Mail prefer that Britain was part of this area, despite being known to firmly oppose freedom of movement?

Let’s be fair to them though, the Mail writers do at least try to hide the hypocrisy of the article, by making the point that the delays are more directly the result of insufficient staffing at the airports in question, implying that the new regulations have been poorly implemented by the EU.

Yet the states to which these airports belong have had over 18 months to prepare for the introduction of the new regulations, which were first presented by the European Commission in December 2015 and amended in March this year, a point made by both the Mail and the EC (possibly the first time these two organisations have ever been in agreement). So the delays are not the result of the regulations themselves, but of inadequate planning by the countries involved and poor management at the individual airports.

And just to put the icing on the cake, the tabloid also criticises the EU for ‘[watering] down the rules at ports and road borders’ – in the very same article

So the rules at ports and road borders are not enough, but those at airports are excessive. It would be nice if the Daily Mail would be kind enough to tell us all what exactly is the right level of border security, given that they are clearly the experts on this issue. 

It is more likely the case that the Mail wants strict regulations to be imposed on people trying to enter Britain, and lighter rules applied to Brits jetting off for a week of lounging on the sunbed. Because of course the right of Britons to a stress-free holiday always comes before the safety of European countries. 

Alas, in its desperation to always be outraged at something to do with the EU, the tabloid has contradicted itself once again. Take a bow, Daily Mail. Take a bow. 

Become An Evolve Politics Subscriber

Your subscriptions go directly into paying our writers a
standard fee for every article they produce. So if you want to help us stay truly independent,
please think about subscribing. We literally couldn’t function without the support of our
fantastic readers.


Subscribe

Or a One-Off Donation to Evolve Politics

If you don’t want to subscribe, but still want to contribute to our
project, you can make a one-off donation via the donate button below. All your donations go
directly to our writers for their work in exposing injustice, inequality and unfairness.

Donate

-- Advertisement --

Evolve needs your help more than ever!

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Tom D. Rogers

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Jess Miller

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Subscriber-Only Comments