-- Advertisement --

Establishment fury as Anti-Corbyn Labour Peer labels Lord Sacks a ‘voice for extremism’ over Enoch Powell-Corbyn comparison

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.

The prominent pro-Remain anti-Corbyn Labour Peer, Lord Andrew Adonis, has sparked Establishment fury after slamming the former Chief Rabbi, Lord Sacks, as a “voice for extremism” over his recent controversial comments which compared the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to the infamously racist Conservative MP, Enoch Powell.

In a letter sent to the former Chief Rabbi this morning, the historically anti-Corbyn Labour Peer wrote that he ‘deplore[d]’ Lord Sacks’ controversial comparison.

Adonis’ letter goes on to question whether Lord Sacks had even read Enoch Powell’s infamous ‘Rivers of Blood Speech’, before slamming the former Chief Rabbi’s rhetoric by stating:

“I do not see how you can even remotely compare this to the remarks you cite made by Jeremy Corbyn.”

Adonis’ astonishing letter then finishes by effectively labelling the former Chief Rabbi as a ‘voice for extremism‘.

Lord Adonis has been previously been an outspoken of Jeremy Corbyn, even calling for his resignation in 2016, and so his latest attack on Lord Sacks’ anti-Corbyn rhetoric marks an astonishing development in the Labour antisemitism row.

The full text of Lord Adonis’ letter to Lord Sacks reads:

“Dear Jonathan,

I so rarely do anything other than admire and indeed repeat & recite what you say that it really pains me to say this – but I deplore your ‘rivers of blood’ remarks this past week.

I thought you might have understandably, given recent events, have ‘let rip’ to a journalist in your initial remarks, but after your interview on The Marr programme yesterday, I realise you really meant them.

Have you read Enoch Powell’s speech? not just ‘rivers of blood’ but the ‘black man’ with ‘the whip hand over the white man’ – a horrendous appeal to racial violence and hatred.

I do not see how you can remotely compare this to the remarks you cite by Jeremy Corbyn.

I do not defend those remarks, but they have no point of context with Powell in their language, character or intent.

I also think that by invoking Powell in this way you encourage and indeed stoke the very social animosities that I know you not only deplore but have spent a lifetime fighting.

This is in no way [reduces] my very great respect for you. Maybe this is another exhibition of the worsening of political and social language in Britain under the strain of bitter controversies.

But I feel we should be voice for moderation, not extremism.

Yours ever,


The fact that a prominent anti-Corbyn Labour Peer has chosen to hit out at the former Chief Rabbi’s controversial rhetoric marks a significant moment in the Labour antisemitism row.

Until now, Labour’s so-called ‘moderate’ wing has been firmly behind the mainstream Jewish establishment in their ongoing criticism of Jeremy Corbyn – even continuing to back the Jewish Labour MP Margaret Hodge after she ramped up the rhetoric to extraordinary levels by comparing Labour’s disciplinary procedure to the Nazi Germany.

But now, Lord Adonis’ astonishing attack on Lord Sacks has sparked a backlash from arch-Corbyn critics in the media.

The Daily Mail hack, Dan Hodges, responded to Adonis’ letter by accusing the Labour Peer of treating the Jewish community as ‘collateral damage’ in an attempt to ‘form an alliance‘ with ‘moderate Corbynites‘ to try and change Labour’s position on a People’s Vote:

In addition to Hodges’ attack, other Establishment figures were also furious that Adonis had effectively defended Jeremy Corbyn by denouncing Lord Sacks’ ‘extremist’ rhetoric:

Whatever Lord Adonis’ motivation for sending the letter denouncing Lord Sacks, the fact that a prominent ‘moderate’ Labour Peer has come out to attack this latest ramping up of rhetoric from a prominent figure in the Jewish community against Jeremy Corbyn is a truly astonishing development in the Labour antisemitism row.

Evolve needs your help more than ever.

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Subscriber-Only Comments

-- Advertisement --


-- Advertisement --