-- Advertisement --

Labour right-winger John Mann admits he could accept Theresa May’s cynical Brexit ‘bribe’

-- Advertisement --

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.

The right-wing Labour MP and arch Brexiteer, John Mann, has been criticised after admitting that he is open to accepting financial incentives – which many are describing as “bribes” – in order to vote for Theresa May’s widely-criticised Brexit withdrawal bill later this month.

On Thursday, it was revealed that the Prime Minister Theresa May was mulling a deeply controversial plan to offer numerous northern Labour MPs extra money for their constituencies in return for votes on her Brexit deal.

Unsurprisingly, the majority of Labour MPs reacted with revulsion to the idea, with the Labour MP for Redcar, Anna Turley, penning an article essentially telling the Prime Minister where to stick her “bribe”.

Furthermore, the Labour Party Chairman, Ian Lavery, reacted to the situation with a scathing article for the LabourList website, stating:

“Theresa May’s desperate attempt to breathe life back into her dead duck of a Brexit deal with investment bungs for MPs in industrial communities should be treated with the contempt it deserves.

[…] Any Labour MP seriously considering discussions with the PM should remember her record and that of her party going back generations. Quite simply, taking such a bribe would be fool’s gold.”

However, it seems not all Labour MPs were so disgusted at Theresa May’s cynical plot, with the Labour MP for Bassettlaw, John Mann – an ardent Brexiteer who has been openly hostile to Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn ever since his election in 2015 – admitting he was open to accepting the deeply controversial Tory financial incentives.

Speaking to BBC News, Mann initially hinted that talks on the offer were already be underway, stating:

“What is going on is some good dialogue, I can tell you that. I am hoping and anticipating that the Prime Minister will come back [from Brussels] with something that is significant. If she does, the chances of Labour MPs from those Leave areas – who don’t want a referendum – voting for her deal, I would say undoubtedly goes up.”

“And so I think it is inevitable – I mean, the political arithmetic says she will come back with something significant. But it’s also what she said when she became Prime Minister. So we’re simply saying to her: ‘that’s whay you said – show us the money!’.”

However, responding to Mann’s statement, BBC News presenter Simon McCoy bluntly asked:

“It’s a bribe, isn’t it?”

Mann responded extremely defensively, stating:

“It’s not a bribe at all. You see, I voted Brexit, and I’ve voted for the deal already. So I can’t be bribed. It’s not about a bribe – it’s about ensuring that we get the best for our area.”

Responding to Mann’s interview, the Labour Deputy Leader Tom Watson told BBC Breakfast that:

“If there are financial bribes for constituencies offered like that, then that would be wrong.”

However, Watson also added that Mann may have “got his words jumbled“, adding that:

“I don’t think any MP would take a bribe like that.”

Whatever the outcome of Theresa May’s latest cynical ploy to obtain a majority for her Brexit deal, this situation of offering money for votes has really only served to prove one thing: austerity was a blatant political choice, not a neccesity.

Much like how Theresa May magicked up a cool billion quid to secure the DUP’s votes after losing her majority in 2017, the Tories always seems to be able to find money when it suits them.

There is more than enough money to go around – but, for as long as the self-serving Tories are allowed to remain in power, public finances will increasingly continue to find their way into the pockets of the rich and powerful, rather than being distributed fairly to the people and services who so desperately need it.

-- Advertisement --

Evolve needs your help more than ever!

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Tom D. Rogers

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Jess Miller

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Subscriber-Only Comments