-- Advertisement --

Stephen Hawking has just hit back at Jeremy Hunt, clinically deconstructing the Health Secretary’s lies

-- Advertisement --

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.

After a week long feud, Stephen Hawking has now hit back at Jeremy Hunt after the Health Secretary accused the acclaimed scientist of a “pernicious falsehood” for his claims that the NHS is moving towards a US-style insurance-based health system.

In his initial article which provoked the debate, Hawking criticised Hunt’s decision to establish a seven-day NHS, claiming that the Health Secretary “cherry-picked” research to support his arguments, whilst flatly ignoring contradictory evidence.

Attacking Hawking’s statement, Hunt claimed that the physicist has no “evidence at all” to back up his arguments, claiming that since the Tories came to power in 2010, the amount of people seeking private health insurance has fallen by 9.4%.

But now, Hawking has clinically deconstructed the ailing Health Secretary.


At the time of Hunt’s initial claims regarding the need for a seven day service, Fiona Godlee, editor-in-chief of the British Medical Journal (the sole source for the Health Secretary’s research into the “weekend effect) had rebuked Hunt for misrepresenting the Journal’s data.

But this isn’t the only case of incomplete data in Hunt’s argument.

Hawking’s article pointed out that while the number of doctors and nurses working for the NHS may be at an “all-time high”, proportionate funding for the Healthcare System is nevertheless inadequate.

In 2015-2016, the NHS suffered a £2.4bn shortfall in funding, its largest ever – and NHS spending per person will continue to decrease into 2019. 

While Hawking does not deny that the amount of people seeking private healthcare insurance may have decreased, he claims that this is because the financial crash has made it more difficult for people to afford private healthcare – stretching the NHS’ resources further.

Despite this, the percentage share of NHS contracts held by private providers has increased significantly from 2.8% when Labour were in government (2006-2007) to 7.6% in 2015-2016. Maybe the government do not want a US-style healthcare system, as Jeremy Hunt claims, but this does provably appear to be the direction into which the NHS is headed. 

The concept of ‘Health Maintenance Organisations’ (HMOs) – which provide services for hospitals and clinics in the US – is being transferred over to our shores under the guise of ‘ACOs‘, or ‘Accountable Care Organisations’, whose management Hawking believes could be snapped up by US HMOs.

Of course the final direction of the NHS is unclear, but Jeremy Hunt’s refusal to study nuanced facts will undoubtedly have negative implementations for the National Health Service.

Difficulties surrounding moving towards a seven day NHS based on the “weekend effect” – the idea that a disproportionate amount of patients die in hospitals on weekends – are just one of the many crises the NHS currently faces.

Other issues, such as underfunding and the removal of bursaries for student nurses, have been used as excuses by the Tories to allow profit-driven multinational corporations to buy up NHS contracts, leading to the gradual privatisation of the health system

And by continuing to assert his own beliefs and twisting evidence to suit his own agenda, Hunt is ignoring the gaping holes appearing at the bottom of the NHS ship, blissfully unaware that forcing staff to row for longer won’t be enough to stop the vessel from sinking into the hands of multinational corporations.

But then again, this was probably his plan all along.

Become An Evolve Politics Subscriber

Your subscriptions go directly into paying our writers a
standard fee for every article they produce. So if you want to help us stay truly independent, please think about subscribing. We literally couldn’t function without the support of our
fantastic readers.


Or a One-Off Donation to Evolve Politics

If you don’t want to subscribe, but still want to contribute to our project, you can make a one-off donation via the donate button below. All your donations go
directly to our writers for their work in exposing injustice, inequality and unfairness.

-- Advertisement --

Evolve needs your help more than ever!

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Tom D. Rogers

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Jess Miller

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Subscriber-Only Comments