-- Advertisement --

Will the Government have to reverse ESA cuts just weeks after forcing them through?

-- Advertisement --

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.

Last week 311 MPs voted to cut ESA for disabled people. From 2017, new ESA claimants in the WRAG (work related activity group) will receive £30 less a week – making it level with the amount those on Job-Seekers Allowance receive. The Government forced through these cuts despite the House of Lords twice rejecting them. 

A petition created by Sanial McCormick on the 9th March demanding that the ESA cuts be reversed, states that the cuts will leave ‘many in literal poverty’. Obviously this petition struck a nerve with many people, and received over 10,000 signatures in the first day. Now, the petition is perilously close to the magical 100,000 signature mark where the Government will debate the issue.

You can sign the petition on the government website to reverse the ESA cuts by clicking this link.

What is quite surprising is the sheer hypocrisy of some of these MPs. Many of the Conservative MPs who voted for these cuts are actually Patrons of disability charities. How does that work exactly? How can you be so bald-faced, remaining connected to a charity for people who are going to be negatively affected by a law you yourself helped to pass?

We have already reported that two Tory MPs have been told to resign – Kit Malthouse as Patron as the Andover MS society and James Cleverly for Advocacy For All. Disabled People Against Cuts have also started a campaign to force disability charities to sever ties with any MP who voted for the cuts, and are asking people to contact charities asking them to do so.

The cuts to ESA will affect millions of disabled people – it won’t ‘encourage’ them to go back to work if there are no jobs out there that are suitable, or they aren’t yet well enough to continue working. The sad truth is that many employers will choose an able-bodied applicant over a disabled one if it means less restrictions. Being disabled is hardly a choice so why on Earth would the Government treat it as such?

If you didn’t catch The Last Leg on Channel 4 last week, the disabled comedian Alex Brooker made a brilliant and heart-felt speech to Ian Duncan Smith.

-- Advertisement --

Evolve needs your help more than ever!

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Tom D. Rogers

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Jess Miller

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Subscriber-Only Comments