-- Advertisement --

NAO report into the extortionate £200Bn cost of PFI should sound the death knell for neoliberal economics

-- Advertisement --

Stay in touch!

Sign up to be updated with Evolve's latest stories, and for opportunities to get involved.

25 years after Private Finance Initiative contracts were introduced by the Conservative government, the National Audit Office (NAO) has finally revealed, to the surprise of absolutely nobody, that they are tear-jerkingly expensive

Private Finance Initiatives are a method of Public Private Partnership, whereby a public project is funded by private equity, which is then paid back, plus an extortionate amount of interest, by the public sector over the life of the project. 

In normal public procurement, the Government essentially pays the private sector, companies like Carillion, to build a public asset – be it a road or a school or a hospital.

With PFI, a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) – a private company – is formed, which raises finance to construct the asset. Once it’s constructed, the Government pay unitary charges to the SPV over the contract period, which is usually 25 to 30 years, to maintain and run the asset. 

At the moment, there are around 700 PFI contracts in existence, which have a capital value of £60bn. The NAO states that they will represent around a £10bn cost to the Government per year. By the year 2040, even if no new PFI contracts are entered into, future charges will amount to £199bn. 

This is no revelation to those administering and monitoring PFI contracts, though. Indeed, it is their very purpose. PFI contract liabilities don’t form part of the deficit balance sheet.

PFI contracts allow a Government to delay and spread the cost of constructing public assets at the cost of vast increases in interest later on. In return, risk is meant to be shifted to the private sector. 

Of course, it isn’t. The Government is the lender and the buyer of last resort. Innumerable are the examples of the Government bailing out private entities that have overstretched in attempting to run a public service. 

Not only this, but the Government incurs the cost of paying for maintenance, cleaning and catering contracts, which are often below standard. This because the private company is necessarily motivated by profit, and so cuts cost to boost its bottom line.

In the light of the Carillion failure, and the fallout in terms of jobs, pensions and stalling public projects, the NAO’s report into the costs of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) generally, and PFI contracts specifically, is but another nail in the coffin for neoliberal economics – a nail which surely signals the beginning of the end for private sector outsourcing.

However, despite the now monumental public opposition to such financially wasteful schemes, the Tories continue to apply the same PFI logic to health provision, seeking to outsource resource allocation in healthcare by using Accountable Care Organisations, which will be governed by commercial contracts rather than statute, making them all but unaccountable to the people.

The NAO report has highlighted that PFI contracts are inflexible and if the Government decides the long-term costs are indeed too much, they are near-impossible to get out of. To buy out of a PFI contract requires upfront payments to the SPV, which most departments are unwilling to make.

PFI and public procurement generally are just another in the raft of sad examples of a Government utterly dependent on the private sector. They are but a shady bookkeeping technique that allows massive corporations control over the public sector, to drive down standards, to crush union-workers, to siphon huge amounts of taxpayer’s money into the pockets of already-wealthy individuals, and, eventually, to be bailed out of the contract if they fail to fulfil. 

Become An Evolve Politics Subscriber

Your subscriptions go directly into paying our writers a standard fee for every article they produce. So if you want to help us stay truly independent, please think about subscribing. We literally couldn’t function without the support of our fantastic readers.


Or a One-Off Donation to Evolve Politics

If you don’t want to subscribe, but still want to contribute to our project, you can make a one-off donation via the donate button below. All your donations go directly to our writers for their work in exposing injustice, inequality and unfairness.

-- Advertisement --

Evolve needs your help more than ever!

We rely on the generosity of our readers to help fund the majority of our work - but we need a little more to make ends meet and enable us to grow.

If we can reach 1,000 regular subscribers, we will become entirely financially sustainable - and we'll also have a little extra so we can build upwards and outwards to make our work have an even bigger impact.

In the last month alone, our work on the Environment Bill has helped force a change in the law for the better. And, since Evolve was founded, our uniquely viral style of journalism has repeatedly put the establishment on the back foot and helped force genuinely positive progression.

But we want to do far more - and we need your help to do it.

The best way you can help us is by becoming a Monthly or Annual subscriber. This kind of regular income allows us to better plan for the future - firstly so we can pay the bills, and then so we can set aside funds and time to work on extra projects.

However, if you can't commit to a regular payment, one-off donations - no matter how small - also make a big difference to us, and we genuinely make the most of every single penny.

So, if you appreciate the work that Evolve does and you want to see us make an even bigger impact on the world, please think about contributing to our work in whatever way you possibly can.

Tom D. Rogers

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Jess Miller

Co-Founder, Contributing Editor

Subscriber-Only Comments